States ›California ›Mono County ›Bridgeport

Bridgeport, CA Tap Water Quality 2026

Water quality report for Bridgeport, CA — PFAS, lead and copper results, violation history and state inspection findings from EPA SDWIS.

A look at Bridgeport's drinking water using EPA enforcement records: violations, lead and copper results, PFAS sampling and state inspection findings.

Main Utility: Bridgeport Pud PWSID: CA2610003 Updated: 2026 Q2
🚨

1 violation currently open

Lead is 1.90 ppb, 13% of the action level. PFAS has never been sampled at this system.

D

Bridgeport earns a D for water quality

Graded on violations and lead, with state inspection findings. PFAS not tested.

Lead: 1.90 ppb — 13% of the federal action level
PFAS never sampled at this system
36 violations since 2015, 16 health-based
1 violation currently open
Bridgeport's lead level vs. all California community water systems
0 ppb5 ppb10 ppb15 ppb
Lead level: 1.90 ppb — 13% of the federal action level
✓ Lower lead than 61% of California utilities
Population Served
433
~288 connections
Water Source
Groundwater
Drawn from wells — SDWIS source code GW
Active Violations
1
1 open of 36 since 2015

Lead & Copper Testing

Lead (Pb)
90th percentile of tap samples collected across the distribution system
13% of EPA action level
1.90 ppb
Action level: 15 ppb
Copper (Cu)
90th percentile of tap samples. SDWIS reports a copper figure only when a system exceeds the action level, so any value here is an exceedance.
107.7% of EPA action level
1,400 ppb
Action level: 1,300 ppb
The 90th-percentile lead result is 1.90 ppb, 13% of the 15 ppb federal action level. The action level is a treatment trigger, not a legal maximum, and it is measured across sampled taps rather than at any single home. Copper reached the action level here; a copper figure appears in SDWIS only when a system triggers it.

Contaminant Violations (2015–Present)

ContaminantTypeMeasuredLimitPeriodStatus
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS REPORTING FAILURE — — 2024 Unaddressed
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS TREATMENT TECHNIQUE — — 2024 Unaddressed
TTHM MONITORING AND REPORTING — 0.080 mg/L 2023 Resolved
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) MONITORING AND REPORTING — 0.060 mg/L 2023 Resolved
TTHM MONITORING AND REPORTING — 0.080 mg/L 2022 Resolved
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) MONITORING AND REPORTING — 0.060 mg/L 2022 Resolved
TTHM MONITORING AND REPORTING — 0.080 mg/L 2021 Resolved
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) MONITORING AND REPORTING — 0.060 mg/L 2021 Resolved
TTHM MONITORING AND REPORTING — 0.080 mg/L 2020 Resolved
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) MONITORING AND REPORTING — 0.060 mg/L 2020 Resolved
Revised Total Coliform Rule MONITORING FAILURE — — 2019 Resolved
TTHM MONITORING AND REPORTING — 0.080 mg/L 2019 Resolved
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) MONITORING AND REPORTING — 0.060 mg/L 2019 Resolved
Arsenic MCL EXCEEDANCE 0.0242 MG/L 0.010 mg/L 2018 Resolved
Arsenic MCL EXCEEDANCE 0.0245 MG/L 0.010 mg/L 2018 Resolved
Arsenic MCL EXCEEDANCE 0.017 MG/L 0.010 mg/L 2018 Resolved
Nitrate MONITORING AND REPORTING — 10 mg/L 2018 Resolved
TTHM MONITORING AND REPORTING — 0.080 mg/L 2018 Resolved
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) MONITORING AND REPORTING — 0.060 mg/L 2018 Resolved
Arsenic MCL EXCEEDANCE 0.023 MG/L 0.010 mg/L 2017 Resolved
Arsenic MCL EXCEEDANCE 0.024 MG/L 0.010 mg/L 2017 Resolved
Arsenic MCL EXCEEDANCE 0.0245 MG/L 0.010 mg/L 2017 Resolved
Arsenic MCL EXCEEDANCE 0.023 MG/L 0.010 mg/L 2017 Resolved
TTHM MONITORING AND REPORTING — 0.080 mg/L 2017 Resolved
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) MONITORING AND REPORTING — 0.060 mg/L 2017 Resolved
Arsenic MCL EXCEEDANCE 0.035 MG/L 0.010 mg/L 2016 Resolved
Arsenic MCL EXCEEDANCE 0.043 MG/L 0.010 mg/L 2016 Resolved
Arsenic MCL EXCEEDANCE 0.034 MG/L 0.010 mg/L 2016 Resolved
Arsenic MCL EXCEEDANCE 0.034 MG/L 0.010 mg/L 2016 Resolved
Lead and Copper Rule MONITORING AND REPORTING — TT 2016 Resolved
TTHM MONITORING AND REPORTING — 0.080 mg/L 2016 Resolved
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) MONITORING AND REPORTING — 0.060 mg/L 2016 Resolved
Arsenic MCL EXCEEDANCE 0.026 MG/L 0.010 mg/L 2015 Resolved
Arsenic MCL EXCEEDANCE 0.027 MG/L 0.010 mg/L 2015 Resolved
Arsenic MCL EXCEEDANCE 0.3 MG/L 0.010 mg/L 2015 Resolved
Arsenic MCL EXCEEDANCE 0.033 MG/L 0.010 mg/L 2015 Resolved
Understanding violation types MCL violations mean a contaminant exceeded the federal maximum limit — the most serious type.
TT (Treatment Technique) violations mean required treatment procedures weren't followed, but don't necessarily mean contamination occurred.

Violation History

1 violation remains open, out of 36 recorded since 2015 (16 health-based).

About the Main Water System

Utility Bridgeport Pud
PWSID CA2610003
Water source Groundwater — Drawn from wells — SDWIS source code GW
Population served 433
Service connections 288
Systems serving this area 1
Regulator State primacy agency
Data through 2026 Q2 — EPA SDWIS

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Bridgeport tap water safe to drink? ▼
No federal limit is exceeded on record. 1 violation(s) remain open. Lead is 1.90 ppb, 13% of the action level.
Does Bridgeport water have PFAS? ▼
This system has never been sampled for PFAS. EPA's national monitoring covered systems serving 3,300 people or more, so no results exist — which is not evidence that none is present.
Who supplies water to Bridgeport? ▼
Bridgeport Pud (PWSID CA2610003). Groundwater. Drawn from wells — SDWIS source code GW
When was this system last inspected? ▼
It was last inspected on 2023-10-10. No significant deficiencies were recorded.

What Should Bridgeport Residents Do?

1
Read your annual water report
Your supplier publishes a Consumer Confidence Report each July covering the prior year.
2
Check for a lead service line
Lead reaches tap water mainly through service lines and household plumbing. Suppliers now publish an inventory identifying lead lines.
3
Follow the open violation
This system has an unresolved violation. Contact the supplier for its corrective-action schedule.

Nearby Cities in California

Mammoth Lakes, Ca Tap Water Quality 2026 Mono June Lake, Ca Tap Water Quality 2026 Mono Coleville, Ca Tap Water Quality 2026 Mono Walker, Ca Tap Water Quality 2026 Mono Crowley Lake, Ca Tap Water Quality 2026 Mono Chalfant, Ca Tap Water Quality 2026 Mono